In Git 2.38, the `merge-tree` command introduced the `--write-tree`
option, which works directly on bare repositories. In Git 2.40, a new parameter `--merge-base` introduced so we require Git 2.40 to use the merge tree feature.
This option produces the merged tree object ID, allowing us to perform
diffs between commits without creating a temporary repository. By
avoiding the overhead of setting up and tearing down temporary repos,
this approach delivers a notable performance improvement.
It also fixes a possible situation that conflict files might be empty
but it's a conflict status according to
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-merge-tree#_mistakes_to_avoid
Replace #35542
---------
Signed-off-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Resolves#36381 by only allowing admins to perform branch renames that
match to branch protection rules.
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Most potential deadlock problems should have been fixed, and new code is
unlikely to cause new problems with the new design.
Also raise the minimum Git version required to 2.6.0 (released in 2015)
- Use `gitrepo.IsRepositoryExist` instead of `util.IsExit` or
`util.IsDir`
- Use `gitrepo.OpenRepository` instead of `git.OpenRepository`
- Use `gitrepo.DeleteRepository` instead of `util.RemoveAll`
- Use `gitrepo.RenameRepository` instead of `util.Rename`
Per-repository signing keys have never been officially supported, as
they would require users to modify the repository’s config file.
At this point, it is clear that only global signing keys (GPG or SSH)
should be allowed. If we want to introduce per-repository signing keys
in the future, it will require a complete design proposal.
The endpoint will not be removed for repository special signing key, but
it will reference the global signing key.
---------
Signed-off-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
1 Move `IsRepositoryModelOrDirExist` and `CheckCreateRepository` to
service layer
2 Use `gitrepo.Pushxxx` instead of `git.Push` when possible
3 use `gitrepo.Clonexxx` instead of `gitrepo.Clone` when possible
fix#36071
looks that's because if an svg in hiden env, it's color added by
`fill="url(#a)"` will become not usefull. by ai helping, I think moving
it out of page by position is a good solution. fell free creat a new
pull request if you have a better soluton. Thanks.
<img width="2198" height="1120" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bbf7c171-0b7f-412a-a1bc-aea3f1629636"
/>
---------
Signed-off-by: a1012112796 <1012112796@qq.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- Update and autofix most issues
- Corrected variable names to `cutOk`
- Impossible condition in `services/migrations/onedev_test.go` removed
- `modules/setting/config_env.go:128:3` looks like a false-positive,
added nolint
/claim #35898Resolves#35898
### Summary of key changes:
1. Add file name search/Go to file functionality to repo button row.
2. Add backend functionality to delete directory
3. Add context menu for directories with functionality to copy path & delete a directory
4. Move Add/Upload file dropdown to right for parity with Github UI
5. Add tree view to the edit/upload UI
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Refactor Git command functions to use WithXXX methods instead of
exposing RunOpts.
This change simplifies reuse across gitrepo and improves consistency,
encapsulation, and maintainability of command options.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Allows users to specify a "force" option in API /contents routes when
modifying files in a new branch. When "force" is true, and the branch
already exists, a force push will occur provided the branch does not
have a branch protection rule that disables force pushing.
This is useful as a way to manage a branch remotely through only the
API. For example in an automated release tool you can pull commits,
analyze, and update a release PR branch all remotely without needing to
clone or perform any local git operations.
Resolve#35538
---------
Co-authored-by: Rob Gonnella <rob.gonnella@papayapay.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Partially fix#32018
`git config` and `git remote` write operations create a temporary file
named `config.lock`. Since these operations are not atomic, they must
not be run in parallel. If two requests attempt to modify the same
repository concurrently—such as during a compare operation—one may fail
due to the presence of an existing `config.lock` file.
In cases where `config.lock` is left behind due to an unexpected program
exit, a global lock mechanism could allow us to safely remove the stale
lock file when a related error is detected. While this behavior is not
yet implemented in this PR, it is planned for a future enhancement.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
For some reasons, branches between database and git are not synced. If a
branch exists in database but not in the git, it should be able to be
deleted.
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Follow up #35096, fix#35095, fix#35115 and add more tests
The old code used some fragile behaviors which depend on the "nil"
receiver. This PR should be a complete fix for more edge cases.
